Difference between revisions of "User talk:Houseofmew"

From Geohashing
imported>Robyn
(Note on page move.)
imported>Relet
m
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I think this should be moved to a User page. -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 20:10, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 
I think this should be moved to a User page. -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 20:10, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 
:And three months later I still think so, so I moved it to the User namespace. It shouldn't affect anything to the negative, and will allow you to receive Houseofmew messages should you wish. -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 04:51, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 
:And three months later I still think so, so I moved it to the User namespace. It shouldn't affect anything to the negative, and will allow you to receive Houseofmew messages should you wish. -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 04:51, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
 +
Hrm, since the user doesn't actually exist, a user page is probably inappropriate. Do they really need their own page? --[[User:Joannac|joannac]] 05:03, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 +
:[[User:ReletBot]] has a page...  ;-)  -- [[User:Benjw|Benjw]] 05:05, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 +
::And a user account, which has bot privileges, so as to not appear in the recent changes. -- [[User:relet|relet]] 08:17, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
Arguments for having an own page for a group:
 +
*they want to track achievements collectively rather than (or in addition to) as individuals
 +
*they will set up a collective e-mail so they all get notifications of page changes here
 +
*they like annoying Joannac.
 +
-[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 05:20, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 +
:Argument against creating it in the user namespace: Someone could register the name as user account and claim the page. Best would probably to register a group account as well. That could even allow group edits and group notifications. :] edit: I just realize that you probably meant this as well, Robyn. -- [[User:relet|relet]] 08:17, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 08:18, 20 May 2009

I think this should be moved to a User page. -Robyn 20:10, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

And three months later I still think so, so I moved it to the User namespace. It shouldn't affect anything to the negative, and will allow you to receive Houseofmew messages should you wish. -Robyn 04:51, 20 May 2009 (UTC)


Hrm, since the user doesn't actually exist, a user page is probably inappropriate. Do they really need their own page? --joannac 05:03, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

User:ReletBot has a page...  ;-) -- Benjw 05:05, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
And a user account, which has bot privileges, so as to not appear in the recent changes. -- relet 08:17, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Arguments for having an own page for a group:

  • they want to track achievements collectively rather than (or in addition to) as individuals
  • they will set up a collective e-mail so they all get notifications of page changes here
  • they like annoying Joannac.

-Robyn 05:20, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Argument against creating it in the user namespace: Someone could register the name as user account and claim the page. Best would probably to register a group account as well. That could even allow group edits and group notifications. :] edit: I just realize that you probably meant this as well, Robyn. -- relet 08:17, 20 May 2009 (UTC)