Difference between revisions of "Talk:Fly a kite achievement"
imported>Relet |
imported>Robyn (want more info) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
: So how many 'supports' does one need to move this potential achievement to the next stage? [[User:Greenslime|Greenslime]] 20:00, 30 June 2010 (UTC) | : So how many 'supports' does one need to move this potential achievement to the next stage? [[User:Greenslime|Greenslime]] 20:00, 30 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
::Just enough to feel good about it. ;) -- [[User:relet|relet]] 11:06, 7 July 2010 (UTC) | ::Just enough to feel good about it. ;) -- [[User:relet|relet]] 11:06, 7 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | I'm not clear on this. Does the KITE have to be over the hashpoint or the flyer have to be standing on the hashpoint? Do you have to physically achieve the geohash coordinates? -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 18:18, 7 July 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:18, 7 July 2010
support - I think there is a real case here for another spontaneous adventure generator. Surely if you can have an award for getting laid at a hash site, which may not always be possible, then flying a kite would be equally in tune with the geohash spirit. JimmyNZ 04:04, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
support - kites are beautiful, and it depends on the location and we need new achievements. :) --relet 17:44, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
support --Crox 21:52, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
support - I actually thought this already was one. --mykaDragonBlue [- i have no sig -] 00:00, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
- So how many 'supports' does one need to move this potential achievement to the next stage? Greenslime 20:00, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
- Just enough to feel good about it. ;) -- relet 11:06, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
I'm not clear on this. Does the KITE have to be over the hashpoint or the flyer have to be standing on the hashpoint? Do you have to physically achieve the geohash coordinates? -Robyn 18:18, 7 July 2010 (UTC)