Difference between revisions of "User talk:Houseofmew"

Latest revision as of 08:18, 20 May 2009

I think this should be moved to a User page. -Robyn 20:10, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

And three months later I still think so, so I moved it to the User namespace. It shouldn't affect anything to the negative, and will allow you to receive Houseofmew messages should you wish. -Robyn 04:51, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Hrm, since the user doesn't actually exist, a user page is probably inappropriate. Do they really need their own page? --joannac 05:03, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

User:ReletBot has a page... ;-) -- Benjw 05:05, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

And a user account, which has bot privileges, so as to not appear in the recent changes. -- relet 08:17, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Arguments for having an own page for a group:

they want to track achievements collectively rather than (or in addition to) as individuals
they will set up a collective e-mail so they all get notifications of page changes here
they like annoying Joannac.

-Robyn 05:20, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Argument against creating it in the user namespace: Someone could register the name as user account and claim the page. Best would probably to register a group account as well. That could even allow group edits and group notifications. :] edit: I just realize that you probably meant this as well, Robyn. -- relet 08:17, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 *they like annoying Joannac.
 -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 05:20, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
-:Argument against creating it in the user namespace: Someone could register the name as user account and claim the page. Best would probably to register a group account as well. That could even allow group edits and group notifications. :] -- [[User:relet|relet]] 08:17, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
+:Argument against creating it in the user namespace: Someone could register the name as user account and claim the page. Best would probably to register a group account as well. That could even allow group edits and group notifications. :] edit: I just realize that you probably meant this as well, Robyn. -- [[User:relet|relet]] 08:17, 20 May 2009 (UTC)