Difference between revisions of "Talk:2010-08-29 51 4"

From Geohashing
imported>Zb
(Yay Hoek van Holland!)
imported>Jiml
(Not Reached vs. Mother Nature)
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
:For alternate locations, the convention is to use "Did not attempt (to reach the correct coordinates)". IMHO this applies here too. -- [[User:relet|relet]] 12:49, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 
:For alternate locations, the convention is to use "Did not attempt (to reach the correct coordinates)". IMHO this applies here too. -- [[User:relet|relet]] 12:49, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 +
 +
I think that the "Not attempted" pretty much applies only when the expedition is only
 +
going to an alternate location.
 +
If you actually try to visit the hashpoint, I think it counts as, say, "Not reached - Mother Nature", even if you
 +
knew it was out in the middle of the ocean and you stopped on the shore looking out at it.  I think it
 +
reflects level of effort  [[User:Jiml|Jiml]] 02:22, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
  
 
== Awesome ==
 
== Awesome ==
 
I love the pictures you took. I was there a lot as a kid while visiting my great-grandpa in Rotterdam. Yay Hoek van Holland! A geohash in the middle of the Maastunnel (the one for bikes and pedestrians) would be most awesome. --[[User:Zb|Zb]] 20:48, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 
I love the pictures you took. I was there a lot as a kid while visiting my great-grandpa in Rotterdam. Yay Hoek van Holland! A geohash in the middle of the Maastunnel (the one for bikes and pedestrians) would be most awesome. --[[User:Zb|Zb]] 20:48, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:22, 1 September 2010

Expedition category

There appears to be a disagreement. Category:Not reached - Mother Nature or Category:Not reached - Did not attempt? I favour the latter because it was always known, even at the planning stage, that the hashpoint was in the middle of the water. The participants were never aiming to actually reach it, just get as close as possible. Jiml appears to favour the former, I think because some sort of expedition was made at all, so "did not attempt" is not appropriate. But I'll let him explain further if he wishes to.

Thoughts from other geohashers, please? Thanks. — Benjw  [talk] 09:22, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

For alternate locations, the convention is to use "Did not attempt (to reach the correct coordinates)". IMHO this applies here too. -- relet 12:49, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

I think that the "Not attempted" pretty much applies only when the expedition is only going to an alternate location. If you actually try to visit the hashpoint, I think it counts as, say, "Not reached - Mother Nature", even if you knew it was out in the middle of the ocean and you stopped on the shore looking out at it. I think it reflects level of effort Jiml 02:22, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Awesome

I love the pictures you took. I was there a lot as a kid while visiting my great-grandpa in Rotterdam. Yay Hoek van Holland! A geohash in the middle of the Maastunnel (the one for bikes and pedestrians) would be most awesome. --Zb 20:48, 31 August 2010 (UTC)