Difference between revisions of "Talk:Stacking achievement"
From Geohashing
imported>Aperfectring (Not my favorite.) |
imported>HiroProtagonist (→Integration of the Over and under achievement in this one: new section) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*'''Support''' - I think the top of cliff/bottom of cliff rule is pretty strict: I would have allowed anything within the circle, but if those are the rules as written, it's fair. The two metre rule is good. That allows tree climbing. -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 05:06, 15 February 2010 (UTC) | *'''Support''' - I think the top of cliff/bottom of cliff rule is pretty strict: I would have allowed anything within the circle, but if those are the rules as written, it's fair. The two metre rule is good. That allows tree climbing. -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 05:06, 15 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
*'''Do not oppose''' - I see this as another of the "hash fell in a very lucky place" type of awards. I don't think we need to create a new ribbon for this sort of thing, but I won't try and hold the community back, if that is the will of the people. It just seems like something which will get claimed extremely rarely, and after the first one or two will lose its novelty. --[[User:Aperfectring|aperfectring]] 05:22, 15 February 2010 (UTC) | *'''Do not oppose''' - I see this as another of the "hash fell in a very lucky place" type of awards. I don't think we need to create a new ribbon for this sort of thing, but I won't try and hold the community back, if that is the will of the people. It just seems like something which will get claimed extremely rarely, and after the first one or two will lose its novelty. --[[User:Aperfectring|aperfectring]] 05:22, 15 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Integration of the [[Over and under achievement]] in this one == | ||
| + | |||
| + | At [[Talk:Over and under achievement]] there was strong support to integrate it into the Stacking achievement as a special case, what do you think about this, [[User:davidc|Davidc]]? | ||
Revision as of 14:47, 1 November 2010
This is a proposal made on 2009-10-17. Please leave comments and suggestions below, indicating whether you:
- Support the proposal
- Do not oppose it
- Oppose (this option requires you to watch the page and return to comment on modifications), or
- Think it Needs work before you can decide.
See Proposed achievements for more information on this process.
- support. I like the idea. Might need to clarify what is the minimum altitude difference between two "levels", and whether you are allowed to bring (ladders/bridges/buildings) to gain the achievement -- relet 17:15, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
- Clarified the wording as requested. --davidc 17:43, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
- support. ilpadre, Fluxkompensator, Mo6eB, his friends and me already did this on today's expedition. Current rules are acceptable, imho. Koepfel talk 18:08, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Do not oppose. Seems like a reasonable achievement definition, but it doesn't seem like it will get achieved very often at all. We can try it and see what happens. Jiml 02:03, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
- support Climbing one of the frequently occurring hashtrees would also count, right? --HiroProtagonist 15:32, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
- Do not oppose, although "simultaneous GPS dancers" doesn't sound very fun to me. Building a human pyramid at the hashpoint would be more fun, especially in public locations (though maybe that would fall under Circus Geohash. --The ru 12:32, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support - I think the top of cliff/bottom of cliff rule is pretty strict: I would have allowed anything within the circle, but if those are the rules as written, it's fair. The two metre rule is good. That allows tree climbing. -Robyn 05:06, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
- Do not oppose - I see this as another of the "hash fell in a very lucky place" type of awards. I don't think we need to create a new ribbon for this sort of thing, but I won't try and hold the community back, if that is the will of the people. It just seems like something which will get claimed extremely rarely, and after the first one or two will lose its novelty. --aperfectring 05:22, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
Integration of the Over and under achievement in this one
At Talk:Over and under achievement there was strong support to integrate it into the Stacking achievement as a special case, what do you think about this, Davidc?
