Difference between revisions of "Talk:Achievements"

Latest revision as of 19:58, 15 January 2022

This page was getting crowded with suggestions that have already been implemented. I've deleted/condensed a lot of old talk so that we can FIND the new talk. If I deleted something you were attached to, you know where the history tab is. -Robyn 15:38, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

1 First geocache
2 Award Icons
3 Proof
4 Organization of Achievements Page
5 Philosophy of New Achievements
6 Creating New Achievements
- 6.1 Implemented Suggestions
- 6.2 Deleted, Merged, Rejected or Downgraded Achievements
7 Tracking Awards
8 Records vs achievements
9 Maintenance
10 Icon re-use in phone apps
11 Achievements for Previous Hashes
12 Achievements Pages Clean Up

First geocache

I feel that for many people reaching there first ever geocache feels like an achievement and it seems worthy of an official achievement to me. Suggested titles "Babies first geocache" (actually that one might be confused with bringing your baby with you to a geocache) Let's keep it simple "My First time" --The George 05:52, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

First timers inevitably get one of the land or water or air ribbons (usually land, but I can think of those who didn't) and that serves that purpose well. I don't think a new first time ribbon is required. -Robyn 01:57, 20 March 2012 (EDT)

Award Icons

Matt suggested icons. DONE.

Discussion of various now-implemented icons and templates deleted.

-- user:Robyn, 15:38 UTC 10 December 2008

Proof

Proof criteria determined.

If the author of an achievement wants to limit it, they can. If not, not. It's all pretty-much honor system, anyway. Ted 02:32, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Am I correct in assuming you have to reach coords to claim most of these awards? "Reach" being a subjective term anyway, depending on your brand/age(/lack of) GPS. Awards you don't have to reach coords for:

Consolation prizes

Correct: I don't think you qualify for these if you DO reach the coordinates.

Hashcard

Correct, from the Hashcard proof section: "You can earn this achievement without reaching the coordinates, but not without seriously trying to get as near as possible."

Admit One

Correct, "You are still eligible for the award even if the exact location was ultimately inaccessible, e.g. inside the lion enclosure at the zoo, or on the actual playing field at a sports event."

Counting towards XKCD-centurion

Sort of correct: you must either meet people or achieve the coordinates.

Please add any others.

Or conversely if you have "sponsored" an award and intended it to be only for people who reached the geohash, make sure that it makes that clear in the achievement text.

Oh, and reaching. So if you have a GPS, then within the margin error of your GPS. If not, identifying the location in some way via google maps or similar. --joannac 00:56, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

I'd be somewhat unimpressed by someone who claimed a major award, like Centurion, or some very difficult geohashes without a GPS unless there was some very strenuous proof involved. I know from experience that "250 m into the bushes from where this road meets that one" can be way way more than 250 good paces into the woods. It's all honour system, really, but one honours some claims more than others. -Robyn 03:01, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Organization of Achievements Page

Page reorganized a couple of times as the list grew.

Philosophy of New Achievements

Seems kinda silly to me to have an award for every single mildly interesting situation that might happen during a geohash. What's the point of having five hundred achievements? Keep it simple. --Joel 20:13, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

I disagree, at least for now. Let's let this evolve in "brainstorming" mode, and let it self-organize for a while. After some time has passed, we can see how things are shaping up and then present ideas for organization. For now, though, I'd hate to quash anyone's creative muse just because someone else thinks it's too silly. Heck, it is the Spontaneous Adventure Generator, after all, and a silly-grin is part of the proof-photo requirement...! Ted 02:28, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Creating New Achievements

This page has been superseded by Proposed achievements. Do not post new proposals here.

If there is a non-implemented achievement here that you would like to see happen, follow the proposal guidelines there and write up a good description of how the achievement should work on its own page with the Category:Proposed achievements, and then edit the page in response to any objections you get. -Robyn 23:14, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

You may also just leave a short note of your idea on Talk:Proposed achievements, that's where I moved all the non yet implemented ideas mentioned somewhere on this page. --HiroProtagonist 21:13, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Implemented Suggestions

Double Geohash - reaching two in one day - Multihash
Blind Geohash achievement, for getting to the exact place without a GPS unit - No Batteries Geohash
International Geohash - go to a different country (easiest for people in say 43, -79) - Border geohash
Martyr - injured reaching a geohash - Trail of Blood
V.I.P - geohash in a members-only or pay-to-enter location - Admit One Geohash
Restricted Area Geohash - legitimate access to restricted area
Holy Hash achievement, when geohashers arrive at coordinates and find a place of worship?
Golf Geohash - on golf course
Hashcard achievement - send a postcard of the hash from the hash
Cross That Bridge Geohash - geohash accessible while on a bridge.
Walking on Water Geohash - on foot, on the surface of a body of water, at the geohash
Posted achievement - As an incentive not to trespass, I think there should be an award like the centurion for no trespassing. --Robyn 15:55, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Deleted, Merged, Rejected or Downgraded Achievements

Achievements that have been actively removed or rejected.

I think it's not a bad idea to go through the list from time to time. You'll often come up with an idea which seems good enough for an achievement, and notice later that it's just not being accepted. -- Relet 00:25, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

I totally support deletion of the subjective achievements. -Robyn 26 August 2008 (UTC)

I support deletion of superfluous and unused achievements. Nemo 13:43, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Don't just delete unused achievements if they are hard. They can be something to strive for even if someone hasn't got them yet. -Robyn 01:55, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Strip Club Geohash - boring (probably unless you actually hit one). But then you could just create one of these for anything you visit.
- I disagree. A strip-club is unusual enough and "off color" enough that having one's geohash spot fall on one is an event worthy of "hey, that's a good story" and sharing with friends. IMO, that makes it a good candidate for an achievement. It's like the graveyard one -- graveyards are far more common than strip-clubs, but the're still "off beat" enough that you'd tell your friends "you won't believe this: the spot was IN A GRAVEYARD, today!"
- Dogging site? - Sorry - I'll get my coat.

"Good stories" are geohash achievements, IMO. 64.74.213.98 14:00, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Smoking Geohash - not actually difficult to achieve, and not that unusual that it could be called interesting.
- I disagree and, hence, removed the delete tag, and placed my defense on the talk page (per delete-tag instructions.) 64.74.213.98 14:00, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
The underpants geohash which was merged with Geoflashing
The MacGyver and Maker awards were partly merged.
The Easy Geohash which was degraded into a [term needed] (subjective achievement? I'd like to remove the term achievement).

Tracking Awards

I visited the "Centurion" page only to sadly discover it's part of XKCD-100. Seems like we need some sort of Hash Counter and Saturday Hash Counter (or awards). I just hit my 5th hash (with only one Saturday meetup), and I'll keep going to 100, even if they aren't all Saturdays (or all at 4:00pm or ...) Thomcat 13 June 2008

I agree. They are getting hard to count, and I've only attempted 14.

Recommend starting a user-page and putting your hash-participation in a section, there. Then it should be a simple matter to demark 5, 10, 25, 50, etc... Ted 21:44, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Perhaps i'm misunderstanding you, but the centurion award also works for numbers less than 100. I've currently made it to one saturday meetup so i added it to my page and it says, amusingly, nullaturion! i believe it goes to decurion when you get ten. --sermoa 20:18, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Records vs achievements

Just wondering if "records" wouldn't make more sense than "achievements" with arbitrary numerical values. Ie, rather than having an achievement for 100 different graticulas (a very big ask), why not just records for "most graticules". There are a few already (highest, lowest, hottest, etc...as well as most consecutive).

Object. Reason: Record holders will continue collecting more points, making it impossible to anyone else to gain that achievement, so one dedicated hasher takes the fun out of it for everyone else.

A few other ideas:

Fastest (from time coordinate is announced)

Object. Has been discussed already and turned down for timezone issues. Depending on place and day of week, the coordinates are not even valid at the moment they come out. Also, in some timezones the coordinates come out in the middle of the night, so these people wouldn't have any chance. --Ekorren 11:26, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

So have a record for each timezone. No reason a Melburnian has to compete with a New Yorker. Stevage 01:09, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

You totally didn't get the point. It's not that some timezones have it more difficult, it's that "waiting for the coordinates and then run off" is simply impractical in many cases while standard in a few other. Australians would need to check the coordinates and run off if suitable in the middle of the night, which is basically not a good time to go to most destinations. In Europe, Asia, and everywhere for the weekend and NYSE holidays, the coordinates are not valid at the time they are announced. So if I would run off to make it a fast geohash, I'd get there on the wrong day, and need to come back the day after. And visiting the actual day's coordinates should always be preferred, that's basically what geohashing is about. Also, in the end it comes down to waiting for the nearest point which is covered by the Couch Potato honorable mention. --Ekorren 07:44, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Furthest (from position when coordinate announced)

"useless-burning-of-fuel-and-driving-too-fast-achievement"? --Ekorren 11:26, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Heh.

Well, actually, that would finally be taken by someone who does a long planned intercontinental flight on saturday and then goes hashing on sunday, and then never be looked at again. There's the globetrotter achievement for this case.

Endurance (drop the 7 day requirement, just make it most consecutive without spending a night in the same place twice)

See general note below.

Hashcram: most people assembled at the point at one time...

See phonebooth stuffing and migration --Ekorren 11:26, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, I found the phonebooth thing a bit weird. Stevage 01:09, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Largest geohash and migration cover it anyway. --Ekorren 07:44, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Simultaneous: most people simultaneously at various hashes

Simultaneous as in at the very same moment? Timezone issue, and hardly organizable. Ekorren 11:26, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Hmm, how would you organise people in so many different places. Oh wait, I know...the internet! But I was actually thinking regionally - you can get quite a few graticules in one timezone. The whole eastern seabord of Australia is one timezone and is hundreds of graticules. Stevage 01:09, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

In that case it comes down to saturday 4 pm which already is a preferred time. --Ekorren 07:44, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Stevage 11:04, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Generally, record achievements are only suitable for a rather short time period. They start with ridiculously low numbers taken by people who didn't really try the achievement but just see they fulfilled the requirements by the word, slowly advancing, until someone does a real effort and sets a record so high that it takes all fun out of even trying for everyone else. At that time, the best thing would be to delete it and start all over again (which is not an option anyway). Which is why I generally do not like achievements based on beating a record, and will always argue against creating more of them. --Ekorren 07:44, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Maintenance

Is anyone else seeing any problems with the template for the Minesweeper Geohash? It looks like someone injected a link into the template somehow. Splitdipless 23:42, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

This was just generic spam, as occurs all over the wiki. An Undo on the template edit usually does for the moment - until the spammer strikes again. Actual solution is to protect the template. Joanna's job. --Ekorren 00:02, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Icon re-use in phone apps

My next plan for the Geohash Droid Anrdoid app is to allow users to add achievements manually when posting to the wiki, something that people seem to have been asking for. I'm right now designing an interface for it, part of which includes the icons used for the achievements themselves. Now, in lieu of downloading all the icons on-demand (unfeasible; this IS supposed to be on a phone, likely in the middle of nowhere, given the nature of geohashing, and besides, that'd just be a bit rude to the maintainers of the wiki), I'm considering putting all the icons in with the app itself.

My question is, do I have the right/permission to redistribute the achievement icons like that? I'll note that many of the icons aren't Randall's work, thus I don't know for sure if they're all under the same CC license under which he puts the rest of XKCD. CaptainSpam 17:32, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

You have the right to do anything you like with anything I've designed, mostly mine are taken from Randalls's work anyway. You probably will have to ask ilpadre and other creators directly. We've been pretty militant about not using things we don't have rights to, e.g. geotrashing achievement was changed because of this. -Robyn

Achievements for Previous Hashes

I would like some clarification on this. Do you still get an achievement if the hash reached was not that day's hash? I don't mean the origin/displaced origin achievements, but the ordinary ones. If not then I think that there should be more awards for previous Hashes. --Mnm7198 17:07, 11 April 2012 (EDT)

This is called "Retro-hashing." In general it is not encouraged, as going to TODAY's hashpoint is what we want to have happen. There are a couple cases, such as you mentioned, as well as Geohashing day where it can come into play. If you have other folks in your graticule, you can all go for a retro-hash together, and that sort of thing is encouraged as an "alternate meeting point" which is better than going to a point that wasn't generated at all. Jiml 17:30, 11 April 2012 (EDT)

This is pretty clear - no achievements for Retrohashes, except of the few ones which are explicitely made for them. It's an integral part of geohashing, that you need to visit the one and unpredictable set of coordinates of that day, instead of some arbitrary covenient point you choose from about 30000 known choices per graticule with all time you need to plan. Where's the challenge in doing so, anyway? --Ekorren 17:23, 11 April 2012 (EDT)

Achievements Pages Clean Up

I have visited every page linked from the Achievement list and tried to improve usability and consistency.
- Add "Category:Achievement award templates" where this is missing.
- Put a link to the template at the top of the page, not in the nether regions of hell.
- Some have no template. I have added a template.
- Some are undocumented. I have documented these.
- Fix anything else that looks odd or inconsistent.
- The ribbon template links were all over the place. Now they are all at the top of the page.

--Sourcerer (talk) 09:26, 22 July 2015 (EDT)

Thanks, Sourcerer! It all looks much better. — Benjw _{talk} 09:36, 22 July 2015 (EDT)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 This page was getting crowded with suggestions that have already been implemented. I've deleted/condensed a lot of old talk so that we can FIND the new talk. If I deleted something you were attached to, you know where the history tab is. -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 15:38, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
-==Award Icons==
+==First geocache==
-[[User:Matt|Matt]] suggested icons. DONE.
+I feel that for many people reaching there first ever geocache feels like an achievement and it seems worthy of an official achievement to me.
+Suggested titles "Babies first geocache" (actually that one might be confused with bringing your baby with you to a geocache)
+Let's keep it simple "My First time"
+--[[User:TheGeorge|The George]] 05:52, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
+:First timers inevitably get one of the land or water or air ribbons (usually land, but I can think of those who didn't) and that serves that purpose well. I don't think a new first time ribbon is required. -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 01:57, 20 March 2012 (EDT)
+== Award Icons ==
+[[User:Matt (2008)|Matt]] suggested icons. DONE.
 Discussion of various now-implemented icons and templates deleted.
+-- [[user:Robyn]], [https://geohashing.site/index.php?title=Talk:Achievements&diff=22099&oldid=22098 15:38 UTC 10 December 2008]
 == Proof ==
@@ Line 29: / Line 41: @@
 Page reorganized a couple of times as the list grew.
-==Creating New Achievements==
-'''This page has been superseded by [[Proposed achievements]]. Do not post new proposals here.'''
-If there is a non-implemented achievement here that you would like to see happen, follow the proposal guidelines there and write up a good description of how the achievement should work on its own page with the [[:Category:Proposed achievements]], and then edit the page in response to any objections you get. -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 23:14, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 ==Philosophy of New Achievements==
@@ Line 41: / Line 48: @@
 :I disagree, at least for now.  Let's let this evolve in "brainstorming" mode, and let it self-organize for a while.  After some time has passed, we can see how things are shaping up and then present ideas for organization.  For now, though, I'd hate to quash anyone's creative muse just because someone else thinks it's too silly.  Heck, it '''is''' the Spontaneous Adventure Generator, after all, and a silly-grin is part of the proof-photo requirement...!  [[User:Ted|Ted]] 02:28, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
-== Ideas ==
+==Creating New Achievements==
-How about something like a Kevin Bacon achievement -- that would be, I suppose, a variant of the [[meet-up achievement]], where you meet a complete stranger at the geohash and then discover an acquaintance that you have in common. (''E.g.'', [[User:Darcy|Darcy]] and Zarah met at the [[2008-05-24_34_-118|first LA geohash]] and discovered that a friend of Darcy's from grad school was a friend of Zarah's from undergrad.) --[[User:Darcy|Darcy]] 09:45, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
+'''This page has been superseded by [[Proposed achievements]]. Do not post new proposals here.'''
-An award for playing some kind of ball game at the hash? I personally am a large fan of Jasper Fforde (anyone know the author?) and would like to have a time dilation preparedness ribbon. (Time dilations are stopped from becoming really bad shit by throwing a sphere through them. . .I don't know, obscure references seem in the spirit of the thing.)-[[User:Sean|Sean]]
+If there is a non-implemented achievement here that you would like to see happen, follow the proposal guidelines there and write up a good description of how the achievement should work on its own page with the [[:Category:Proposed achievements]], and then edit the page in response to any objections you get. -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 23:14, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
-:I'm a bit of a Jasper Fforde fan, but if anyone wants to play Croquet Ffrodian style I'll have to go looking for some body armour. Let there be sport. -- [[User:UnwiseOwl|UnwiseOwl]] 10:08, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
-::There is no way I'll be playing croquet Fforde style. Maybe regular style. Or some other ball game. -[[User:Sean|Sean]]
-I've created a [[User:the_ru/test | (Almost) Lost Something While Geohashing Consolation Prize/honorable mention]] ribbon - what do you think? [[User:the_ru | the ru]] 09:34, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
-:That's amusing.  You need an icon from XKCD#71, or ''Lost'', ''Lost in Space'', maybe ''Land of the Lost''. --[[User:Jevanyn|Jevanyn]]
+You may also just leave a short note of your idea on [[Talk:Proposed achievements]], that's where I moved all the non yet implemented ideas mentioned somewhere on this page. --[[User:HiroProtagonist|HiroProtagonist]] 21:13, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
-:I'd support a Lost consolation prize. Is this for people who do or do not reach the geohash, or both? You need to make an achievement description page too showing requirements for proof and whatnot. The standard geohahshing icon is pretty boring for the ribbon, though. How about from one of those bubble in space  comics? Might be #71, I didn't heck Jev's link. -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 16:43, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
-:71 is "I lost you in the trees". IMO it could be used for any expedition, successful or not. It would be hard to reach the coordinates if you had lost the GPS receiver, for example. It's more intended for amusing trivia than as a serious prize though. I'll make a real icon if enough people are interested. The only problem is where I should put the ribbon - maybe I shouldn't clutter the Template: namespace with silly things, yet keeping it under a User: isn't very elegant. --the ru
-::"Serious" doesn't describe many of the achievements, so I wouldn't worry about that. It could either be in [[Achievements#Challenge Achievements#Single Geohash Challenges]] for "reaching a geohash despite getting lost/losing something" but I think it would best fit in  [[Achievements#Consolation Prizes]] for "losing something while geohashing, even if you did get to the point." -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 18:33, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
-Walking on water discussion moved to [[Talk:Walking on Water Geohash]] -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 21:32, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
-* As an incentive not to trespass, I think there should be an award like the centurion for no trespassing. More on the [[No Trespassing Geohash#No Trespassing Collection Award|No trespassing talk page]]. -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 15:55, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
-How about something for those special dates? Pi Day (3/14), Mole Day (10/23 between 6:02 AM and 6:02 PM), Darwin Day (2/12), Square Root Day (3/3/09), Earth Day (4/22). Or any other " special" date deemed significant by the masses. [[User:Mr. Bow Tie|Mr. Bow Tie]] 01:48, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
-I think this is a joke. '''Parting With Parts''' for burying and leaving your own internal organ at a geohash. Here's a summary of the discussion on the geohashing IRC
-:I just parted ways with my appendix.
-::I'll make you a special ribbon if you bury it at a geohash location.
-:I got five teeth removed, can I use them?
-::It should be organs or limbs only. If we allow teeth, people will want to use hair or fingernail clippings.
-:That should qualify if you had, like, a pound of them.
-::What if I shave my head at the geohash?
-Relet wants someone to iron laundry at the geohash and get a ribbon for it: [[Template:Irony]]
-I wasn't sure where to put this, but I had an idea for an achievement as I was reading the [[Cover Stories]] page.  Could we have a Waldo or Carmen San Diego achievement for those people who find someone dressed as Waldo or Carmen San Diego at the hash?  Maybe even if they dress up as one of the characters themselves.  Just a thought... [[User:Crazycaveman|Crazycaveman]] 16:12, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
-:It goes over on [[Talk:Achievements]]. I'll put it there. I think it's one of those that falls in the category, "do it, and we'll think about giving you a ribbon."  I imagine a "reach the geohash in costume" ribbon would go over well. - [[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 16:49, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
-:Bullseye Achievement - for visiting the exact centre of your graticule, i.e. X deg 30'.000, Y deg 30'.000 en route to or from the geohash. Maybe I'll probpose it properly later. Just wanted to save the idea. -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 22:02, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
-How about a '''Wikipedia Achievement'''? It goes like this: You gather a piece of information while you are on an expedition. This piece of information qualifies for a serious edit to an article on Wikipedia, so you go ahead and put it into the article. It may even be a completely new article, but any joke articles or vandalism to existing articles is strongly discouraged -- Wikipedia is real stuff, after all, and different rules apply compared to this fine Wiki. The achievement will probably mainly happen because of photographs taken during expeditions, but I'd like to keep it open to anything that clearly came from the expedition and qualified for a serious contribution to Wikipedia, and not have it limited to only the English Wikipedia. Proof is done by a link to the Wikipedia article that the contribution has been put into. Example: Pictures for [http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mammendorf Mammendorf on Wikipedia (de)] were taken during [[2009-04-03_48_11]]. The article still is really short and doesn't have a lot of information in it, but the pictures were a small improvement anyhow. I like the idea mostly because it is useful to the public, but also because I had fun finding stuff that qualified for Wikipedia during expeditions.
-<gallery>
-Image:Wikipedia Achievement.jpg|A possible picture for the ribbon.
-</gallery>--[[User:Zb|Zb]] 18:57, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
-:But it doesn't work because Wikipedia disqualifies original research. Everything is supposed to be based on citations from authoritative sources. They delete original research. So unless you go to a library, which is too obscure, doesn't work. -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 18:59, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
-::Well, it seems to be o.k. for pictures. Like, the churches are there and the fact they're there is proof enough, I think? Aren't pictures proof and self-explanatory enough? (BTW: Reading your concern, it seems like I've already picked the right picture for the ribbon, eh?) --[[User:Zb|Zb]] 19:02, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
-:I like the icon, and lots of icons to have around for Gratuitous achievements are good. Whenever I've put up pictures of places I've been to illustrate Wikipedia articles they have been taken down. I really don't think they like that sort of thing. So if you proposed this according to the proposed [[:Category:Proposed achievements]] system I'd give it a "do not oppose." -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 19:17, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
-::I see how your concerns exist for a reason. My experience has been different, however. Here's another example: After I went on [[2009-03-28 48 11]] and took a picture of the yellow engine, I looked at [http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/DR-Baureihe_119 this wikipedia article], where there had already been a section about the few remaining engines of this class, mentioning the yellow ones used for construction work. I uploaded the picture and it has been accepted. Maybe it really depends on the subject of the article. Especially with pictures, though, I think Wikipedia depends on original work by contributers because stuff from books or other websites is copyrighted, with few exceptions. For this reason, mainly, I think it's really weird your contributions have been turned down. --[[User:Zb|Zb]] 19:31, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
-:::I oppose the achievement because I think it encourages adding non-significant or misunderstood details to wikipedia articles. If you happen to find out something that should be mentioned there, do it for the sake of the truth, but don't just write something to get a ribbon. --[[User:Ekorren|Ekorren]] 19:39, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
-::::Agree. Pro: The Achievement might encourage people to contribute to Wikipedia in a helpful way. Con: The Achievement might encourage people to put strange stuff into Wikipedia. I've already named the concerns above and would definitely include them into the rules, and I think people should be able to distinguish between a game (here) and serious stuff (Wikipedia) and still do something useful, but I still see how folks might get it wrong. Let's see what others say...--[[User:Zb|Zb]] 19:49, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 ===Implemented Suggestions===
@@ Line 105: / Line 67: @@
 *[[Cross That Bridge Geohash]] - geohash accessible while on a bridge.
 *[[Walking on Water Geohash]] - on foot, on the surface of a body of water, at the geohash
+*[[Posted achievement]] - As an incentive not to trespass, I think there should be an award like the centurion for no trespassing. --[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 15:55, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
-===Not Implemented===
-Summary of ideas that have been suggested and then ignored or just not yet implemented.
-*Passing Through - went through geohash but couldn't stay. Examples include going through it on a train, plane, or chased by wild animals
-*Party Crasher - Interrupted a social event (i.e. wedding) - Good idea
-*Hammer Time - Reached geohash using the MC Hammer Slide
-*Tape Measure Geohash - Have a tape measure extending contest at the geohash
-*Cross Country Geohash - Travel from point A to B at the rate of one Lat/Lon quadrant a day, reaching the respective Geohash each day.
-*Wedding Geohash - Get married at the geohash. Wouldn't that be hilarious?  Issue invitations that explain the algorithm, but no one knows exactly where it will be until the day of. You might have to rent a boat, even a helicopter. Obviously I'm not serious.
-*Close but No Cigar / Close Enough for Government Work consolation -- You get within about 100m and decide you're "close enough" (I see a lot of these on weekday meetup pages
-:*There could be some version of this for being in the same (relatively small) mulicipality as the geohash, as in [[2009-07-23 40 -74]].
-::*Oppose. It's not really an achievement to just reach the town the place belongs to. Also, municipalities vary highly in size - there is an active hasher living in a municipality that covers an area which equals five full graticules. And, whoever said ''I see a lot of these on weekday meetup pages'' in the original statement, must have referred to the very beginnings. Almost all of those playing today are very honest about reaching. There are enough consolation prizes to cover the ''not reached'' cases. --[[User:Ekorren|Ekorren]] 15:47, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
-*No "There" There consolation -- Your GPS can't decide if you've found the hashpoint or not
-:*This actually just happened to Danatar....[[2008-12-14 50 9]]
-*Midnight Madness Multihash -- special multihash for going to a geohash for Friday or Saturday), then at midnight travelling to the Saturday/Sunday geohash as quickly as possible.
-*Discover something of previously unknown historic importance / a new species / a UFO while geohashing.
-::This sounds like the Wikipedia geohash from above -- [[User:Jevanyn|Jevanyn]]
-*Idol Geohash: meet a famous person, such as a band member or an actor.
-*"D20 Hash" or something of the like for role playing or a "Board but not bored Hash" for playing board games at the hash site.
-*Time-Travel Geohash Award - coordinates fall in a "renaissance faire" or going to to a geohash site of some date in the past, preferably in period garb.  (the only people interested disagreed on what a Time Travel Geohash would be)
-*What if the geohashers play guitar hero at the point? GHHGH! (no interest, few locations have electrical power)
 ===Deleted, Merged, Rejected or Downgraded Achievements===
@@ Line 140: / Line 81: @@
 * Strip Club Geohash - boring (probably unless you actually hit one). But then you could just create one of these for anything you visit.
-** I disagree.  A strip-club is unusual enough and "off color" enough that having one's geohash spot fall on one is an event worthy of "hey, that's a good story" and sharing with friends.  IMO, that makes it a good candidate for an achievement.  It's like the graveyard one -- graveyards are far more common than strip-clubs, but the're still "off beat" enough that you'd tell your friends "you won't believe this: the spot was IN A GRAVEYARD, today!"  "Good stories" are geohash achievements, IMO. [[Special:Contributions/64.74.213.98|64.74.213.98]] 14:00, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
+** I disagree.  A strip-club is unusual enough and "off color" enough that having one's geohash spot fall on one is an event worthy of "hey, that's a good story" and sharing with friends.  IMO, that makes it a good candidate for an achievement.  It's like the graveyard one -- graveyards are far more common than strip-clubs, but the're still "off beat" enough that you'd tell your friends "you won't believe this: the spot was IN A GRAVEYARD, today!"
+** Dogging site? - Sorry - I'll get my coat.
+"Good stories" are geohash achievements, IMO. [[Special:Contributions/64.74.213.98|64.74.213.98]] 14:00, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Smoking Geohash - not actually difficult to achieve, and not that unusual that it could be called interesting.
 ** I disagree and, hence, removed the delete tag, and placed my defense on the talk page (per delete-tag instructions.) [[Special:Contributions/64.74.213.98|64.74.213.98]] 14:00, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
@@ Line 146: / Line 89: @@
 * The [[MacGyver Achievement|MacGyver]] and [[Maker Achievement|Maker]] awards were partly merged.
 * The [[Easy Geohash]] which was degraded into a [term needed] (subjective achievement? I'd like to remove the term achievement).
-== Award Suggestions ==
-Recent suggestions still being debated. Make a subsection if you have lots to say about your suggestion, else short description below.
-=== Highlander Geohash Achievement? ===
-As a fencer, I may be biased in considering this idea mildly awesome. Further, there are definite safety, liability, and standardization concerns which need to be considered before it could be successfully implemented.
-Off the top of my head: (no pun intended)
--Safety concerns being most important, it should go without saying that only practice weapons are permitted. Standard padded practice attire (or acceptable analogues thereof) and facemasks for both participants are also a necessity. There are some concerns specific to fencing outdoors like weather conditions, ground conditions, heat stroke in the warmer climates, and public safety which must also be considered. Further, it stands to reason that attempting to attain a Highlander achievement would increase the likelihood of the geohashers involved satisfying the requirements necessary for a Police achievement. Thus, it would behoove any such geohashers to know their rights beforehand, and conduct themselves with the dignity, honor, and respect that their noble schools have no doubt instilled in them. Note, however, that it is ''always'' unwise to challenge an officer of the law to any duel or fencing contest in response to a perceived lack of the above mentioned virtues on their part.
--Different weapons and scoring techniques would make competition between foil and sabre practitioners (for example) difficult to judge. This problem would only be compounded by the inclusion of Kendo or other fencing traditions, yet their inclusion is essential to a true replication of highlander conditions. Possible solutions might be standardized rules of engagement, inclusion of other geohashers as arbiters, or agreement on specific terms before the contest. A combination of these solutions may be ideal.
--Really, anybody who bouts at geohash coordinates deserves an achievement, yet there can be only one. Perhaps there might be one achievement ribbon for the victor, along with a slightly less cephalic ribbon for the less fortunate participant?
--Depending on the size and population density of the naval craft being used as a venue, it may be inappropriate, unsafe, or illegal to attempt to earn both the Water achievement and the Highlander achievement in one go. That said, given the existence of a Restricted Area achievement, a "Swashbuckling" achievement for the few pirates who have the means (Oil drill workers? Cruise ship crew? Messiahs?) seems to be indicated.
-I look forward to the day when graticule pages come complete with the names of local duelists, so as to facilitate travel for epic battles in far-away lands ^_^
-=== James Castle Award ===
-I saw an exhibit of [[google:James Charles Castle|James Castle]] art at the Philadelphia Museum last year, and he's been featured on television once or twice.  He was a self-taught artist who specialized in making things out of found objects and other materials most people would consider trash.  This got me thinking: how about an award for art made from stuff found at/around a geohash?
-=== Zoological Awards ===
-*Heffalump award: for getting a picture of an "unusual" animal.  Unusual as in, squirrels and alley cats don't count.  Animals in a zoo also don't qualify, unless the geohash is in their pen :-)
-*Old McDonald award: for farm animals
-*Audobon award: for pictures of birds taken near the geohash.  Minimum 3?
-*Jacque Cousteau: for pictures of aquatic life taken near a geohash.  The geohash doesn't have to be in the water, but should be relatively close by.
-*Go Diego Go award: for helping a wounded animal near a geohash.
-BTW, I'm also looking for pictures of animals to add [[Wildlife|here]].  With geohashers on 5 continents, we should get a pretty good assortment :-). -- [[User:Jevanyn|Jevanyn]] 16:31, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
-:I'd support an award for finding an animal at the geohash, but I think cats and squirrels should count. An animal just on the way, meh. I was also thinking of a more general "Look What I Found!" achievement, for when you get to a geohash and just want to tell the world what was there, without having to create an achievement for every bizarre thing that could be at a geohash. Maybe divide it into Animal, Mineral & Vegetable? -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 17:35, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
-::I don't think we need an achievement for interesting things/animals found at the hash. Also, even seemingly ordinary soil could be exciting for a geologist. Such an achievement would just be too subjective. If you stumble upon something unusual during your expedition, write about it in your expedition report. If it's unusual enough, you'll get a place in the Hall of Amazingness anyway. But I wouldn't oppose creating a "Look What I Found!" gallery page (similar to that recently created Wildlife gallery page). --[[User:Ilpadre|Ilpadre]] 17:50, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
-:::I understand the desire to put the brakes on too many "what's the point?" achievements, but you've just expressed an interest in a gallery of 'hey look at that' stuff. One of the advantages of achievements is that people like them, they collect them and thus without even knowing it, add themselves to a list on the category page. Compare the number of people listed in the "Winners" section to the number of Users linked to the category for any award, and you'll see what I mean. Perhaps we need a new category of ribbon that isn't an achievement, isn't a consolation prize, it's just there Serendipity Ribbon?  It would include the [[Easy Geohash]] the Animal (and Mineral & Vegetable) ribbons and so one. I don't see anything wrong with a geologist having a ribbon on his page commemorating a special kind of granite. Once upon a time I said that the relative difficulty or specialness of the achievements doesn't matter because people can compare for themselves the difficulty of parachuting onto the geohash versus writing a postcard there. And then someone independently created a [[Hashcard achievement|postcard achievement]] and it's great. -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 18:20, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
-::::I love the idea of a 'look what I found' award. We could have a ribbon like the one for global hash achievement, where each section becomes colored as you achieve the individual portions. --[[User:Kate|Kate]] 21:12, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
-:::::Oh, I'm with my hashing buddy Kate, that sounds like fun. Just think of what the ribbon would look like...-- [[User:UnwiseOwl|UnwiseOwl]] 22:31, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
-=== Handshake ===
-Perhaps some sort of achievement for most people met? Many of the late Boston crew might be tempted to return to Geohashing to claim it ;)  This seems different than Kevin Bacon (above), but somehow related... --[[User:Thomcat|Thomcat]] 21:03, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
-=== Geokegging ===
-... hey, if you have an award for [[Sex Geohash|getting laid]], why not one for throwing a spontaneous party?
-:Just do it. Shiny ribbons will follow. Also, if you're popular, you might aim for the (original) Migration Achievement. :) -- [[User:relet|relet]] 21:42, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
-=== Decicule ===
-What about one for visiting the decihash? I ribbon with a number option to say how often you've narrowed the play area down. See [[Decicule|Decicule]]. By [[User:Splitdipless|Splitdipless]] 20:01, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
-:A decihash is never a true geohash, also it is far too easy as there are 100 times as many points to choose from in the same area. Visiting such a point will always count as "Coordinates not reached" as these are not the official coordinates. Such a visit is not really a geohashing expedition, and a true geohasher wouldn't call it one at all. --[[User:Ekorren|Ekorren]] 20:15, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
-::We have an achievement for the Globalhash, and by the same logic it too is not a true geohashing expedition. Or perhaps make it like reverse-regional where it's the number of decicules you get in a graticle. Me, I'm just tired of seeing the hash land in Lake Ontario. By the same degree, for an up in challenge, the decacule: 10° by 10° play area. [[User:Splitdipless|Splitdipless]] 03:11, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
-:;:The globalhash is over 100,000 times harder than the geohash. A decihash is 100 times easier. It's just too trivial. Vancouver (and right now me in Fort Nelson) shares your pain over waiting for an achievable geohash, but ''therein'' lies the challenge of geohashing. -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]] 04:14, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
-::::You know, thinking it over, there is the problem that the areas are too small and allows for too much abuse in choosing the area in which to go hashing. Okay, I'm convinced. Nothing for decicules. [[User:Splitdipless|Splitdipless]] 22:44, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
-:An achievement for visiting every decicule within a graticule? -- [[User:Jevanyn|Jevanyn]]
-::Kind of like the Minesweeper achievement, but on a smaller scale. It would have to implement the level system, as I can imagine most graticles would pose problems that would render a statistically significant amount of the decihashes unachievable under any circumstances. Perhaps a level after every 10 or 20, and the full award after 100 sucessful mini-visits. [[User:Splitdipless|Splitdipless]] 19:39, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
-:::I would not oppose this if and only if the points visited were the official graticule coordinates.  Other than that, you you end up encouraging people to go on expeditions which aren't the official geohash, and we still end up with the community fracturing issue which was part of the reason the deci/centicule hashing algorithm was rejected.  I realize graticules are an arbitrary boundary (as are political ones usually), but graticule boundaries have an official meaning in geohashing, and political boundaries have a meaning outside geohashing.  The whole deci/centicule thing just seems to me to be that one step too far into the arbitrary.  --[[User:Aperfectring|aperfectring]] 20:03, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
-::::That suggestion brings up a good point, as it makes it more like the reverse regional achievement. It would promote people to leave their 'comfort zone' and go for hashes outside of the decicule they may live in.
-I think it works contrary to what the purpose of the original suggestion though, which is to show that when the hash is no way achievable within a graticle to a participant, that people are still willing to go to a semi-random point which is based on the original algorithm (so far, using the decihash corollary). I agree that an achievement for getting to a decihash is too easy and can be gamed for an achievement on it's own, so perhaps we're focusing to much on decihashes. What about a consolation for heading out with GPS in hand with no intention of ever getting to the actual hash, but using the algorithm in some way to generate an adventure? Something like 'willing the end but has not the means.' [[User:Splitdipless|Splitdipless]] 16:00, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
-:There is nothing preventing you from going out on trips to deci/centicules if you wish.  However, the only part which is actually using '''''the''''' algorithm is the official geohashing point for that day.  Achievements should be based on expeditions to that point and only that point, since this is the geohashing site.  Going out on random adventures is great, but we shouldn't make achievements for non-geohashing things, even if they use an algorithm which is very similar to/based on the geohashing algorithm.  Even if you know you will inevitably fail for the hashpoint, you can usually still make an expedition out of it.  I have done that multiple times, and those times have been at least as much fun as the ones where I actually reached the point.  I fully understand the frustration with having hashpoints which are unreachable, since over 80% of all points in my graticule fall in that category, but I will oppose any achievements which are about going to any point but the official one, and that includes the globalhash.  --[[User:Aperfectring|aperfectring]] 13:34, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
-::You brought up the same point I did. The algorithm doesn't provide for a globalhash, but we have an achievement for it. Some people think that the globalhash is deserving because it is a heck of a lot more difficult then a geohash. However, the cat is out of the bag when it comes to using the algorithm for expeditions not involving the geohash the globalhash as a prime example. Also, we have consolation prizes for when you set out and do not get the geohash and potentially going to a decihash would be an example of expedition and not getting to the geohash. [[User:Splitdipless|Splitdipless]] 18:29, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
-First of all, we have consolation prizes for trying but not succeeding. We do not have consolation prizes for not even starting but knowingly doing something totally different. Second, the globalhash is seeing the entire planet as one graticule, which is not only much harder, but also a non-arbitrary division - the non-division, so to speak. This is meant and seen as some kind of ultimate challenge, and it is a surely global thing. The decicule is none of these. It's just a very small totally arbitrary area which has no background whatsoever. So why just a hundredth of a graticule? Why not an area that covers 7.91 graticules instead, i.e. divide the earth in a 32 by 64 grid... would be nice, wouldn't it? But totally senseless at the same time, wouldn't it? While I think the globalhash is a good idea because of it's globality and uniqueness, the decicule is nothing. It wouldn't even be worth discussing, usually. --[[User:Ekorren|Ekorren]] 19:29, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
-=== Webcam ===
-This occurred to me [[2009-08-10 50 -1|today]], after noticing that there was a webcam that probably captured my image as I passed by twice, on my way to and from the hash (it was on the ferry pier at Hythe).  I'm not sure how often it would happen, but I'd suggest that getting an image from a webcam showing you actually at the hash point as proof would be a noteworthy achievement, and perhaps should have a ribbon.  This would be achieved in one of two ways, I think:
-# by prior knowledge of the webcam and arrangement of a capture by software or accomplice, or
-# by finding the image afterwards on a webcam that has an archive page
-As many webcams timestamp their images, it's quite possible that this would count as good proof of co-ordinates reached in many cases.  Honorable mention would entail getting a webcam image of you on your way to or from the hash point. --[[User:Macronencer|macronencer]] 00:00, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
-:Hashpoints don't usually end up in front of a webcam. Actually, the chance they do and it's not just a "view from that peak down into the valley" cam (i.e. the chance that you will be more than one blurry pixel on the picture), is close enough to zero to call it virtually impossible. Capturing an image while you are out is either expensive technique (like a laptop with mobile internet access) or a whole annoyance. I'm sure I wouldn't even try to research webcams prior to starting for a hash. --[[User:Ekorren|Ekorren]] 00:11, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
-::I see your point, but we have a couch potato award with odds of several million to one against.  Is this really so different?  I actually know the locations of quite a few webcams in my area, and the chance of a hash turning up in one of them is much higher than the chance of it turning up in my home.  You are right about the blurry pixels problem, and perhaps this should not be acceptable as proof of co-ordinates reached - but I see no reason not to make it a ribbon, at least. --[[User:Macronencer|macronencer]] 00:18, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
-:::In german we say, "you compare apples and pears", if you compare two things that can't be compared. The couch potato achievement serves as a good and funny "end of the line" lucky location, even if noone ever will claim it. If it ever happens, it will people drive crazy and will be celebrated by the entire community. There's nothing so much special in about standing before a webcam. Also, there is a honorable mention of the couch potato achievement, which has been claimed a number of times, and is something you recognize when looking at the hashpoint map immediately, getting basically everyone to try that hash no matter what.
-:::In geocaching, there are a number of so called webcam caches which require exactly what you want: Capturing an image. Organizing that the image is captured while you are there, with yourself being recognizable on the picture, is difficult enough if you know there is a camera, know the exact point where to stand to be well visible, and can plan and schedule the whole action to your needs. Nothing of this is usually given in geohashing. Doing lots of time-consuming researches whether there might be a camera to keep the hope to find one some day, with a probability that's near zero that it actually works out, and then organizing not only to get there but also to capture that image just in time is such a nuisance that it won't be done. Btw, capturing the image would, strictly speaking, often even be illegal for copyright reasons. So, what I want to point at is lack of usability ''combined with'' lack of probability, but emphasizing the former. --[[User:Ekorren|Ekorren]] 08:21, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
-::::"Comparing apples and pears" - oooh, we have that phrase in english too! or sometimes it's apples and oranges :) [[User:Sermoa|--sermoa]] 12:10, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
-:::I'd like to add that I like the idea and think it would be quite funny if someone actually would be able to make a proof photo by using a preexisting webcam. I just don't think that we should make an achievement out of this beforehand, especially since the chance is so low and the preparational issues so large. If you make it, make yourself a gratuitious ribbon and tell us all about it. Your story will be appreciated, whether there has been an actual achievement for a few years or not. Not everything funny you can do has actually to be an achievement, has it? --[[User:Ekorren|Ekorren]] 09:27, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
-:I'm intrigued by the idea. I know it's unlikely to be something I get, but it could be a bit of fun --[[User:MykaDragonBlue|mykaDragonBlue &#91;- i have no sig -&#93;]] 02:03, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
-:Definitely in favour of the webcam idea but i'd like to extend it to not actually having to be there. Like a geohash by proxy. Quite often i look around the peeron map, zoom in and pretend i'm there. I went (virtually) to a lovely beach on the west coast of cornwall on sunday! If i could find a webcam that points at a geohash and post footage, wherever it is in the world, then i could claim to have experienced the geohash. It could probably only happen in town centres, and it's still quite unlikely, but if somebody actually found one, surely they deserve a ribbon?! I bet a lot of people would want to go on the webcam to have a look! [[User:Sermoa|--sermoa]] 07:14, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
-::Trying to meet my own challenge now ... there is a [http://irc.peeron.com/xkcd/map/map.html?date=2009-08-12&lat=52&long=-1&zoom=14 geohash in nottingham tomorrow] in a car park off mansfield road which might possibly be [http://www.itsnottingham.info/cctv/ on a webcam]. choose Mansfield Road in the first dropdown and then Valley Road / Mansfield Road in the second dropdown. I'll have to wait until tomorrow morning to see whether the exact location is visible, but it'll be pretty close! [[User:Sermoa|--sermoa]]
-:If the Hashpoint actually ends up in front of a webcam, I'd accept an image from the webcam as proof, if you (or somebody you know) goes there without a GPS and holds up a XKCD sign. I don't think we'd need an achievement for this either. Simply showing the webcam image, without actually going there or sending someone might make a nice "expedition report", but it shouldn't count as coordinates reached, then, imho. [[User:Koepfel|Koepfel]] <sub><small><small>[[User_talk:Koepfel|talk]]</small></small></sub> 09:46, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
-Thanks everyone for your contributions so far.  There are good points for and against this.  If capturing the images is actually illegal then that would present the biggest problem, I think.  I'm not sure of the status of such things, nor how to find out the situation.  I do think it's worth a gratuitous ribbon at least if it happens - and since Sermoa has fortuitously found a potential webcam hash tomorrow, maybe we are about to discover exactly how difficult it is to achieve.  I noticed that the webcams on that page refresh quite infrequently, so to be sure of a picture, someone is going to get rather tired arms holding the XKCD sign up for a couple of minutes ;)  Apart from the legal issues, I'm still fond of this idea, but I'd be quite happy to be outvoted or have it made into an optional gratuitous ribbon really - what counts for me is that the idea is out in the open, and maybe someone will now do it, which will be fun! --[[User:Macronencer|macronencer]] 21:48, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
-: It can't be illegal ... or if it is, then google streetview is in a phenomenal amount of trouble! [[User:Sermoa|--sermoa]] 22:33, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
-::What has google streetview to do with that? The point is that the picture is property of the operator of the camera, and copying it to somewhere else than the page where you found it needs permission. --[[User:Ekorren|Ekorren]] 23:25, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
-:::Yes, unfortunately Ekorren is right, as Sermoa has now reported on the meetup page that the images are copyrighted so we cannot upload them.  That does not prevent anyway from having a look to see whether they can see their friends, and even capturing the images locally, provided they are never published.  So I have been persuaded: I now think this should just be assigned a gratuitous ribbon, assuming it can ever be achieved. --[[User:Macronencer|macronencer]] 14:37, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
 == Tracking Awards ==
 I visited the "Centurion" page only to sadly discover it's part of [[XKCD-100]]. Seems like we need some sort of Hash Counter and Saturday Hash Counter (or awards). I just hit my 5th hash (with only one Saturday meetup), and I'll keep going to 100, even if they aren't all Saturdays (or all at 4:00pm or ...)
 [[User:Thomcat|Thomcat]] 13 June 2008
@@ Line 251: / Line 99: @@
 : Perhaps i'm misunderstanding you, but the [[Xkcd_centurion_achievement | centurion award]] also works for numbers less than 100. I've currently made it to one saturday meetup so i added it to my page and it says, amusingly, nullaturion! i believe it goes to decurion when you get ten. [[User:Sermoa|--sermoa]] 20:18, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 == Records vs achievements ==
@@ Line 283: / Line 132: @@
 :Generally, record achievements are only suitable for a rather short time period. They start with ridiculously low numbers taken by people who didn't really try the achievement but just see they fulfilled the requirements by the word, slowly advancing, until someone does a real effort and sets a record so high that it takes all fun out of even trying for everyone else. At that time, the best thing would be to delete it and start all over again (which is not an option anyway). Which is why I generally do not like achievements based on beating a record, and will always argue against creating more of them. --[[User:Ekorren|Ekorren]] 07:44, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
+== Maintenance ==
+Is anyone else seeing any problems with the template for the [[Minesweeper_Geohash|Minesweeper Geohash]]? It looks like someone injected a link into the template somehow. [[User:Splitdipless|Splitdipless]] 23:42, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
+:This was just generic spam, as occurs all over the wiki. An Undo on the template edit usually does for the moment - until the spammer strikes again. Actual solution is to protect the template. Joanna's job. --[[User:Ekorren|Ekorren]] 00:02, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
+== Icon re-use in phone apps ==
+My next plan for the Geohash Droid Anrdoid app is to allow users to add achievements manually when posting to the wiki, something that people seem to have been asking for.  I'm right now designing an interface for it, part of which includes the icons used for the achievements themselves.  Now, in lieu of downloading all the icons on-demand (unfeasible; this IS supposed to be on a phone, likely in the middle of nowhere, given the nature of geohashing, and besides, that'd just be a bit rude to the maintainers of the wiki), I'm considering putting all the icons in with the app itself.
+My question is, do I have the right/permission to redistribute the achievement icons like that?  I'll note that many of the icons aren't Randall's work, thus I don't know for sure if they're all under the same CC license under which he puts the rest of XKCD. [[User:CaptainSpam|CaptainSpam]] 17:32, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
+You have the right to do anything you like with anything I've designed, mostly mine are taken from Randalls's work anyway. You probably will have to ask ilpadre and other creators directly. We've been pretty militant about not using things we don't have rights to, e.g. geotrashing achievement was changed because of this. -[[User:Robyn|Robyn]]
+== Achievements for Previous Hashes ==
+I would like some clarification on this. Do you still get an achievement if the hash reached was not that day's hash? I don't mean the origin/displaced origin achievements, but the ordinary ones. If not then I think that there should be more awards for previous Hashes.
+--[[User:Mnm7198|Mnm7198]] 17:07, 11 April 2012 (EDT)
+:This is called "Retro-hashing."   In general it is not encouraged, as going to TODAY's hashpoint is what we want to have happen.  There are a couple cases, such as you mentioned, as well as Geohashing day where it can come into play.  If you have other folks in your graticule, you can all go for a retro-hash together, and that sort of thing is encouraged as an "alternate meeting point" which is better than going to a point that wasn't generated at all.  [[User:Jiml|Jiml]] 17:30, 11 April 2012 (EDT)
+:This is pretty clear - no achievements for [[Retrohash]]es, except of the few ones which are explicitely made for them. It's an integral part of geohashing, that you need to visit the one and unpredictable set of coordinates of that day, instead of some arbitrary covenient point you choose from about 30000 known choices per graticule with all time you need to plan. Where's the challenge in doing so, anyway? --[[User:Ekorren|Ekorren]] 17:23, 11 April 2012 (EDT)
+== Achievements Pages Clean Up ==
+* I have visited every page linked from the Achievement list and tried to improve usability and consistency.
+** Add "[[:Category:Achievement award templates]]" where this is missing.
+** Put a link to the template at the top of the page, not in the nether regions of hell.
+** Some have no template. I have added a template.
+** Some are undocumented. I have documented these.
+** Fix anything else that looks odd or inconsistent.
+** The ribbon template links were all over the place. Now they are all at the top of the page.
+--[[User:Sourcerer|Sourcerer]] ([[User talk:Sourcerer|talk]]) 09:26, 22 July 2015 (EDT)
+:Thanks, Sourcerer!  It all looks much better.  — <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">[[User:Benjw|Benjw]]</span>&nbsp; <sub>{[[User talk:Benjw|talk]]}</sub> 09:36, 22 July 2015 (EDT)